DepoStack

DepoStack ReviewEarly-access waitlist

Review the rough draft with the audio close.

DepoStack Review is exploring an audio-aligned rough-draft workspace that surfaces uncertainty for human judgment. Supported inputs, data terms, and export behavior remain under validation.

Join waitlist
DepoDraft product-tour interface showing a synthetic rough-draft review queue beside audio-alignment controls
Authentic product-tour capture from the current DepoDraft build, using synthetic case data and no client media. DepoStack Review is the public capability name.Open full-resolution capture in a new tab
Status
Early-access waitlist
Access
Requests open
Release track
Release wave 1

This module is being validated. Supported inputs, scope, and availability remain subject to testing.

Early-access waitlist. Product scope and certification boundaries are not final.

Three focused tools for three distinct jobs.

Prepare exhibits, review a rough draft, or synchronize deposition video. Start with the job in front of you.

Assistance should surface the question, not hide the judgment.

Rough-draft review can require repeated listening, searching, and re-entry. Review is researching where audio alignment and clear uncertainty cues can help without replacing reporter judgment.

The boundaries early access must prove.

  • Proposed audio alignment

    The early-access goal is to align supported audio with reporter-provided output so a reviewer can move between a rough-draft line and the relevant audio.

  • Human-controlled assists

    The direction treats every suggested word, speaker, and punctuation change as optional. Silent changes and automated certification are outside the brief.

  • Focused uncertainty review

    Research is exploring how low-confidence words, suspects, untranslates, conflicts, and inaudible spans can be surfaced without presenting a finished-looking transcript.

  • Reporter-provided inputs

    The intended workflow starts with supported audio and a reporter’s own notes or rough output. Accepted formats and timing behavior will be disclosed per test build.

  • Case-context research

    The concept explores using a notice, witness worksheet, or exhibit list to suggest matter terms. Data handling and deletion terms must be approved before testing files.

  • Rough-draft exports only

    Any early export remains a rough draft for reporter review. Supported formats, pagination behavior, and the boundary around final production are not yet published.

A proposed review path with a human checkpoint at every stage.

  1. Confirm the test inputs

    An early-access participant receives the supported-input and data-handling terms before providing audio or reporter output.

  2. Review surfaced uncertainty

    The proposed workspace connects flagged spans with the relevant audio while leaving every accept, edit, or keep decision to the reporter.

  3. Return to the established workflow

    Any tested export remains a rough draft and moves into the reporter’s existing editing, quality-control, and certification process.

For the professionals responsible for the rough draft.

Court reporters

Help define which audio-synced review cues save time without weakening authorship, review, or certification boundaries.

Firms and scopists

Help test assignment, dictionary, and review handoffs without assuming shared access, automation, or data terms that are not yet approved.

Join the DepoStack Review waitlist.

Share your role and email. We will store your Review interest and contact selected participants when test scope, supported inputs, and data terms are ready.

No paid offer is available. Test requirements and terms are disclosed before any file is provided.